🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager endured a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.